Since the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling against school segregation, Black women teachers (BWTs) have had perpetually high rates of attrition, despite their legacy of providing high quality, emancipatory education. Thus, the purpose of this study was to contextualize the attrition of critical BWTs to better understand the factors that would support their sustainability in urban schools. Specifically, I investigated (a) the relationship between Black women’s intersectional identities and their experiences as critical educators in urban schools, (b) the compounding factors that led to their ultimate departure, and (c) the complexities of their decision to leave the profession.
Using Black feminist thought and cognitive dissonance theory as my framework, I employed sista circle methodology to study fifteen post-service critical Black women teachers. Each participant engaged in an individual interview, one of three sista circles, and a written reflection. Data analysis revealed three major themes that offer rich context and a complex narrative of why critical BWTs love and leave the classroom: instinct vs. opposition, commitments vs. personal needs, and dissonance-reduction strategies. As they are examined, these themes suggest several actions that can be taken by key stakeholders to support their professional sustainability.